Tuesday, September 20, 2011

An Easy Way to Start on the Road to a Deming-like Management Method

I come from the perspective that the Deming Management Method (DMM) is as difficult as it is made to be. Many times it is made out to be very complex. To me it is simple and when I communicate it I try to keep it as simple as possible. I would recommend three simple and yet profound books:
1) The Deming Management Method by Mary Walton. $5 in a discount bookstore. It will give you an overview of Dr Deming's thinking, enough to apply in any organization, and practical examples. The examples of implementation (Ford is one) are mostly out of date because quality improvement is continuous and many organizations do not have the power to stay the course.
2) To understand the concept of a system and related thoughts (if necessary) I would recommend "The Goal" by Eliyahu Goldratt. This book will cost new $25 and used less.
3) Lastly and it might be the most important, a book on positive leadership, "LEADING PEOPLE TO BE HIGHLY MOTIVATED AND COMMITTED" by Ben S. Simonton. Simply stating it is a profound and unique book. Ben has a website and the book can be purchased in pdf format for $10. Over the years leadership, positive leadership, in my mind has become the building blocks and glue of DMM. Without the type of leadership Dr Deming practiced there will be no sustaining power for a Deming-guide CQI system. This is the answer to the question why DMM is not more widespread practiced. There is a great lack of positive leadership in many of our countries.

This $40 max cost will be well worth the value. In my life the fruits have been incalculable from a business and personal level.

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Blog and a Group Together

I am going to combine this blog and a Linkedin group and update them concurrently. A  blog gives greater flexibility and enables catagorization. Also entries and comments can be edited. I am not the best proof reader. I am applying all my CQI abilities to personally improve this skill, but it is not going as fast as I would like. This is a weakness of mine. Plus there are other features available with a blog to grow and expand it.
The group at Linkedin.com is "Grass Roots Deming". Do a simple search in groups using keyword Deming and you will find it. Same grass roots theme. If leaders are not willing to listen, then we will go to the bottom (so to speak), find the leaders there, and work our way up. We will start at the grass roots level and allow them to enjoy the fruits of Dr Deming. This would include the willing worker just wanting to do a better job in his place of employment, the small business owner, the farmer or the artist. This, my friends, is the greatest part by far of the working folks. Why wait for our leaders if they will not change. When we become small business owners and work for ourselves, whether we are aware of it or not, we become leaders/ managers. We are enpowered in the day we make that decision to work for ourselves. And of course all leaders are welcome.

All are invited and encouraged to start topics on the blog, Deming's from the Bottom Up or on the blog.

Many Consultants Ruin the Broth!

If Dr Deming is ever to be relevant in a wide-scale the control of his philosophy by many consultants must be put off. Most do not understand the basic motivation of Dr Deming as he influenced Japanese society, His motivation was people. The well-being and improvement of the Japanese people after the consequences of World War II. The orphans and the homeless. The fathers who could not support their family and the mothers who could not feed their children. These are the things that haunted Dr Deming and became his motivation for his unceasing beating of the drum of glimpses of how humans act and respond. A philosophy that is contrary point of a view of a Machiavellian perspective. Instead of the manipulation of people to keep power and provide few with the greatest good, there is cooperation to provide the most with the greatest good. This is where we are today in our culture on every level. Do we provide the greatest good to the few or the many, and how do we provide it, by opportunity or brute force.

When I say consultants are in control of Dr Deming's philosophy let me qualify this by saying most. I do not know all consultants. And so to the few who do not distort the philosophy of Dr Deming and do not refuse to understand the essence of Dr Deming's wisdom, his heart for the good of all people, I say welcome. But no solicitation. Start by helping folks with free advice, advice to the grass roots. How ironic that this is turning into the age old argument attached to the arts. If financial gain becomes our incentive, rather than art for art sake, what happens to the art. I see the philosophy of Dr Deming more as an art than a science. The art of cooperation for the benefit of the most. In the art of "people management" our culture has been corrupted by greed.

Where do you start when implementing the wisdom of Dr Deming?

Motivation! Motivation! Motivation! When Dr Deming went to Japan after WWII he did not go over to revolutionize Japanese industry. He was a statistician hired by the US Census Bureau. What took him in the direction he went was the plight of the people, in particular, the children and orphans and the elderly. This was his motivation- people. His focus on quality, statistics , etc were all tools that would be used to better the Japanese people. I could write about the destruction the Japanese faced after the war but I will let the reader do the research if he or she does not know.

Now there are many CEO's and company owners (leaders) who have an acute sense of the responsibility they carry and the employees and their families who are dependent on the organizations they lead. There are others who see it as a revenue stream to get rich and others a mixture of both. For the leaders who see it only as a way to get rich, gain power and prestige, Dr Deming is not the way for you. Six Sigma and a lack of world class quality is fine for you. To those who are aware of the people they lead and want to secure the future for them as much as they can, with the motivation that you already have learn of Dr Deming and in simplicity start implementing his simple wisdom. For those of mixed motivation, I would not half-heartedly implement the wisdom of Dr Deming. This would be very disheartening for your employees. I would work on your own motivations first.

Our human tendency is to not be proactive. Generally speaking we are reactive. We like the status quo. Dr Deming's advice is proactive. Is not the generational quality of Honda Motors and their consistent incremental growth over many years securing the future for it's employees and their families? Is not the situation they provide their employees a better situation than what US auto manufacturers have provided theirs. End of my argument.

Layoffs and DMM

I think there is a direct correlation between the quality of management (leadership) and layoffs, especially as it relates to huge layoffs of many thousands of people we routinely see in the news in our present generation, but also layoffs in general and at any level. Now I will admit there are special cases where a tsunami or earthquake can be the cause of layoffs. But a tsunami or an earthquake does not have to be a guarantee of layoffs. Without a Deming-style, influenced or mirrored quality management system with people as the focus, processes in statistical control and monitored, and management freed up to look at the future, management's vision is on putting out fires. The competition most certainly will catch them by surprise. The result is loss of marketshare, revenue, profitabilty and layoffs. It is imperative for a healthy society to have employed people, and the ideal being employed people with a sense of security.

To make my case on the relationship of quality management and layoffs, I give you the following link:
http://money.msn.com/investing/ceos-who-became-job-killers-thestreet.aspx?cp-documentid=6834878&GT1=33002

Let me know your thoughts.

Is the Deming Management Method (DMM) outdated?

I do not think DMM is outdated. I do not think Dr Deming's counsel has even been given a fair shake outside of Japan for the most part as yet, not even close in the US.

A Foundational and an Introductory Course to Dr Deming's Work for anyone with an interest

Six Sigma is not the Deming Management Method (DMM). DMM is not SS

Statistics and DMM are not one and the same. Statistics is part of DMM, but not the majority (greater than 50%), perhaps 20-30%.  (We can discuss the percentage and even do a study.) Six Sigma is an overemphasis on statistics.  If Six Sigma is implemented inside DMM I see no evidence of cooperation with leadership and the willing worker, only lip service. In fact I see isolation of the willing worker and management to a greater degree from experience. Isolation from the market, and reality. This overemphasis on statistics by it's very nature produces managing the worker by numbers and objectives. This overemphasis produces waste and inefficiencies. One step forward, and two steps back. This is exactly what US auto manufacturers did for over a generation. Instead of eliminating numerical quotas they create them ad infinitum.

Performing a quick search on "Deming" among groups on LinkedIn, the top two groups consisting of 6469 members exclusively are Black Belts and Green Belts themed. Only black belt and green belts apply here. There are 18 groups following, that are Deming-centric with 2122 members.

So what is my point? SS thinks that it is DMM, and that is the predominant thought of 75% of 8591 members of groups that use the name Deming to describe their purpose. You will find this same thought among the quality groups on LinkedIn i.e. ASQ which includes many more thousands of members. DMM has been diluted, watered down and mischaracterized.

Why should I make this point? I am of the opinion that for the largest part outside of Japan and except for isolated instances the full impact of DMM has not been experienced. I think the results of DMM were coveted and in a shallow way imitated, but the complete package not implemented. I think there were many failures in these half-hearted attempts. The response to these failures was something else was needed, and for the most part it evolved into SS, lean manufacturing, etc, etc. with no real "quality" quality system implemented. No SoPk. 

DMM is simple

Dr Deming's advice is not complicated. It is as simple as it is made out to be. And I make it very simple. It has to be simple if a simple person like me can have a profound understanding of DMM and it can profoundly impact my job day to day for over the last 20 years. Dr Deming himself said you did not need a high formal education to be competent with SoPK. Mary Walton's "Deming Management Method" (DMM) has enough in it to revolutionize a company or institution, if leaders would take it to heart. But alas, for the most part, coveting the rewards of DMM, they desire the results without the real work: people first. The real work is working with the willing worker. And without the real work our legacy (western business and US in particular since I live in the US) will continue to be: ENRON, real estate collapse, banking industry mismanagement, auto company demise, urban decay, etc, etc.

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Non-profit group saves 150 homes from tax auction block with $194K

Profound knowledge, knowledge that is under our noses, pops up all around us. Dr Deming gave us a System of Profound Knowledge (SoPK) that has the potential to continually generate profound knowledge. It is called profound because of the reaction we have when it is uncovered and the impact it can have on our activities. It can appear by chance, intuition or a SoPK.

The article below appeared in the Sunday, January 9, 2011, Detroit Free Press entitled "Nonprofit group saves 150 homes from tax auction block with $194,000." With all the millions spent very ineffectively trying to prevent folks from losing their homes, a small organization armed with Profound Knowledge very effectively and efficiently saves scores of homes from foreclosure. Good job, United Housing Coalition!

http://www.freep.com/article/20110109/NEWS06/101090510/1319/Coalition-saves-150-homes-from-tax-auction-block-with-194000

Anti-Point 11: Increase numercial quotas

My tongue is firmly planted in cheek as I am writing this! By the rationale of US industry and the auto manufacturers in particular Dr Deming's was totally ignorant of human psychology. You do not eliminate numerical quotas, you increase them to improve quality is their motto. Read the article: "GM: Tie workers' pay to vehicle quality". http://www.linkedin.com/redirect?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdetnews%2Ecom%2Farticle%2F20110111%2FAUTO04%2F101110385%2F-1%2FARCHIVE%2FGM--Tie-workers%E2%80%99-pay-to-vehicle-quality&urlhash=vBI3&_t=tracking_anet

This is definitely the mantra of the Six Sigma I have encountered, "Increase Numercial Quotas". We can call it the Anti-Deming Management Method and thus, the 14 Anti-Points

Saturday, January 8, 2011

Why Layoffs Generally Result from Incompetent Management?

At one time I read somewhere there are three steps to layoffs:
1) Layoff managers
2) Layoff managers
3) Layoff managers
The point is "what brings a company to a place and a time where in some cases there is a need to layoff tens of thousands of employees at one time?" This means there was no proactiveness, no attrition, and no forethought among management. I cannot even imagine a company carrying an extra 20,000 employees it does not need to perform the function of the company, and then in one fell swoop, make redundant 20,000 employees. This huge excess of employees were all hired by management. Not one of these redundancies were hired by a front-line worker. So if there was so gross a miscalculation of manpower who should pay the price first, second and third. I think better managers/leaders were needed. And then often when the managers are let go there is no rhyme or reason for their layoffs. In particular American culture needs a change of culture.

I could go on and on here making my point, but I won't. The point is so simple and basic with students of Dr Deming that I will just let the link below stand as a witness to my thoughts on the matter.

http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/enderle/why-layoffs-generally-result-from-incompetent-management/?cs=30821

Understanding the Motive of Dr Deming in Japan: PEOPLE

It is my thought the main reason Dr Deming's management method has not been more widely accepted and implemented in North America is because the motivated force behind his work in Japan was not known or understood. The following exert is from "Deming Management Method" by Mary Walton. I strongly recommend all who want to learn about Dr Deming start with Mary's work.

"Japan had paid dearly for its participation in World War II. Of its major cities only Kyoto had escaped wide-scale damage from aerial bombardments, and 668,000 citizen haad died. The nation's industrial base was in ruins; agricultural production was off by a thrid. The once-prosperous populace had first gone without consumer goods, then without food for the wartime effort. Now there was little of either. The cities had been destroyed; many Japanese had scattered to the countryside. Morale had collasped. They had lost confidence in themselves and in their leaders, which perhaps explains why they greeting the Allied occupation forces with so little hostility.

Under US General Douglas MacArthur, SCAP made priorities of dismantling the military goverment and establishing a constitutional regime. When Dr. Deming arrived, two years into the occupation, little physical recovery was yet in evidence. He toook note in his diary of the suffering: 'Practically all the area of heavy industry between Tokyo and Yokhama and in every big city is a complete blank, some concrete and twisted steel left. New wooden homes are springing up like mushrooms everywhere over the seared areas. The debris is practically all cleared away; what is not being built on is in winter wheat or garden. Food was scarce. A tearoom in those days , he would later say, was exactly that-no more than tea was served. Rice, which was also in short supply, could not be served in restaurants. People were forbidden to sleep in the Tokyo train station, because so many had died, not from cold, but from hunger. He carried candy from the Army PX with him on his travels because no food was available.

The plight of the children moved him the most. On one occasion, an American captain took him to the railroad yards where twenty or thirty homeless men slept on rice mats. He saw and old man and a young boy huddled around a charcoal burner with scarcely a flame. Teh boy told the captain that he had been in an institution but the adults ate all the food so he ran away. Deming wrote in his diary, 'At 11:30 I crawled into my beautiful bed, wondering why some of the people have so many good things, while others are sleeping on mats in rags and hungry. Another time he visited and institution: "Miserable wretches in rags, most of them dying of hunger. Human being wasting away. Curous mixtures of the sick with the well, old and dying. Crazy people in dark cells, no windows because they would escape. But who said they were crazy, and who wouldn't be? He used whatever authority he had to urge that the superintendent be fired.

Then in years to come, he did not closet himself with the American colony that sprang up in post-war Japan. He delighted himself in invitations from Japanese hosts, and sought to familiarize himself with the culture, frequently attending Kabuki theater and Noh plays, exploring markets and shops, visiting temples and shrines. 'My method of learning is to become, so far as posssible Japanese, he wrote in 1956. His longtime secretary, Cecelia Kilian remembers him studying Japanese by records late at night in his Washington study."

Dr Deming went to Japan as a census worker. He was effected by the plight of people. The motivating force that tranformed him was PEOPLE. It changed him from census bureau employee to corporate consultant extrodinaire. It gave him a single mission over decades. And it was in this role he would have a most profound impact on the nation of Japan. Thirty years later (early 1980's) America would finally have their eyes opened to see the results of this transformation. The results being high quality, high market penetration and profitability. It was these results America for the most part wanted and desired. Give us the results they said without taking the time to understand the motivating force: PEOPLE.

And so US companies went to Toyota and other Japanese companies and attempted to learn and imitate their systems of "lean manufacturing" they called it. Lean manufacturing is the result of the Deming Management Method applied correctly over years. US companies imitated and developed statistical science which eventually evolved into their own brand, called Six Sigma, which goes directly in the face of Dr Deming's advice, eliminate numerical quotas. Statistics is a important part of the Deming Management Method, but a part nonetheless. They picked and chose portions of the whole in an attempt to bring about the results in as short as time as possible. Their results were usually not sustainable or evolved into the next fad. It is now assumed that management fads are a necessary part of management. You have to have fads to loook at your company a different way, they say. Go to most companies and look on the managers' desk for the book on the current fad. The sustainability of  quality is directly proportional to the commitment to PEOPLE: the employees, managers, customers, community, nation and even the globe in a large multinational corporation. When I speak of the sustainability of quality I am speaking about quality that lasts more than one generation, 30 years. This is my benchmark. This does not mean being in business for a long time, but setting a standard for quality in the industry that a company participates. Honda Motors, the number one internal combustion engine manufacturer in the world, meets this requirement now and stands out above the rest. This is my benchmark for quality in industry. But the past is not a guarantee of the future. Look at Toyota for an example of this. They have damaged their reputation considerably by practicing numerical quotas: be the number one auto manfacturer by volume in the world or "beat GM". They have lost marketshare and Some profitability, had many recalls and opened themselves up to considerable liability. But despite this, they have not stumbled so far as US auto makers have i.e. bankruptcy, mergers and buyouts. There is still an element of sustainabilty of quality in Toyota, US automakers are attempting to achieve. Remember we are looking in the 30 year range. US automakers have just begun to attempt to achieve world class quality. They are in their young adolescent years in terms of quality.